j$k1804023j$k
Petition from Crompton Greaves Ltd for the appointment of distributors for Jalgoan Urban Cum Rural Division under the Jalgaon Circle and the execution of the franchise distribution agreement of 01.06.2011, by and between MSEDCL and Petitioner. After connecting 1,000 MW of solar electricity at a rate of Rs 2.71 and Rs 2.72 per unit in 2018, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd (MSEDCL) will now sign contracts to purchase electricity (… In its response, MSEDCL stated that there was no valid agreement for these projects and that Orange Maha Wind had not completed registration with MEDA in 2015, in accordance with the state renewable energy policy. In addition, MSEDCL added that its communication to the generator did not guarantee the purchase of electricity. He noted that the communication also indicated that the authorization to commission the project at issue depended on MEDA`s approval of the projects within 15 days. Petition from ISMT Limited to order MSEDCL to comply with the Hon`ble Commission`s decision of 08.09.2004 to comply with the commitment made in the Energy Bank Agreement of 7.05.2010 and to repeal The Commercial Circular No. 170 of 13.06.2012 of MSEDCL. The absence of an EPA would not lead to network stability problems and MSEDCL`s decision to separate the projects is illegal. It is explained that there is no link between the implementation of the EPO and the safety of the network as long as electricity is provided after proper forecasting and planning.
In addition, the petition stated that there was no High Court order ordering MSEDCL to cancel the electricity allocation agreement from the projects at issue, to abstain from the issuance of credits or to separate the projects. MSEDCL has published its communication on the separation of these projects without justification or justification. Petition of Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. under Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003, concerning the resolution of disputes arising from issues relating to the seller`s obligation to provide contractual capacity (Article 5.1.1) of the 04.06.2010 power purchase agreement between Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. and Wardha Power Company Ltd. Even when consumers on the roof of solar energy celebrated the relief given to them by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC), MSEDCL dropped a bomb. It has proposed astronomical grid charges that will make solar electricity more expensive than its own energy. Petition of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for the determination of the tariff through the tender procedure for the purchase of electricity by the licensees (MSEDCL) in the case of Wind (Renewable) Energy for FY2013-14 within Maharashtra. Petition by Shri Mahendra J Tardeja (Prop. Prerana Stone Crusher). for the non-compliance with the interim order established by CGRF – Interim Order by Hon`ble Electricity Ombudsman after J.-C.C. Suo-Motu, verification procedure and compliance with the renewable energy commitment targets for F.Y 2010-11 and F.Y 2011-12, in accordance with MERC (Renewable Purchase Obligation), its compliance and Implementation of REC framework) Regulations, 2010.
Petition of Shaligram Yadav Satav for Non compliance of Directions of Hon`ble MERC (Standards of Performance of Distribution Licensees, Period for Giving Supply and Determination of Compensation) Regulations, 2005 by MSEDCL Nandura – Secretary CGRF Amravati. Taxation and remuneration of consumption rights per unit of energy to be collected by a consumer from the state government and payable to the state government; Under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act of 1958, the two letters of interviewees inviting the petitioner to provide explanations/responses regarding the payment of additional taxes on electricity on the basis that the electricity tax is also hereditary in payment fees and late interest.